Transfon Team

Header bidding generates significant revenue for digital publishers, but without proper analytics you are flying blind. A misconfigured bidder, a spike in timeouts, or a consent management issue can silently drain thousands of dollars before anyone notices. This guide compares the leading prebid analytics solutions and shows you exactly what to track.
The header bidding ecosystem has matured significantly. Most top publishers run Prebid.js with multiple demand partners competing for every impression. The complexity of managing 5, 10, or even 20+ bidders across multiple ad slots means that problems are inevitable — and invisible without analytics.
Consider what happens without analytics: a bidder adapter breaks after a Prebid.js version update, and no one notices for three days. A consent management platform update silently blocks bid requests to half your demand partners. Your timeout settings are too aggressive, cutting off high-value bids before they arrive. Each of these scenarios costs real revenue, and each is trivially detectable with proper analytics in place.
The shift to real-time analytics has been particularly important. Traditional approaches — pulling reports from your ad server the next day, or checking weekly revenue summaries — create dangerous blind spots. By the time you spot a problem in yesterday's report, it has already cost you a full day of revenue. Real-time analytics tools like Pubperf give publishers the ability to detect and diagnose issues within minutes.
Before comparing tools, you need to understand what metrics actually matter for header bidding performance. Not all analytics platforms track the same things, and the metrics you prioritize should drive your tool selection.
Bid rate measures the percentage of auction requests that return a bid from a given demand partner. Win rate measures how often that bidder's bid is the highest and wins the auction. Together, these two metrics tell you whether a bidder is actively participating and competitive.
A healthy bidder should have a bid rate above 60-70% and a win rate that reflects its competitive position. If a bidder's bid rate suddenly drops from 80% to 20%, something is wrong — likely a configuration issue, an adapter error, or a consent problem. If a bidder has a high bid rate but near-zero win rate, their bids are consistently too low or your floor prices are too high.
Average eCPM across all bidders is a vanity metric. What matters is the winning eCPM per bidder — what each demand partner actually pays when they win an auction. This tells you which bidders bring the most value per impression.
Be cautious about bidders that bid high but rarely win. A bidder with a $5 eCPM but a 2% win rate contributes far less revenue than one with a $2 eCPM and a 25% win rate. Pubperf's real-time eCPM tracking lets you see these patterns as they develop, not after the fact.
Every header bidding setup has a timeout — typically 1,000 to 3,000 milliseconds — after which the auction closes regardless of whether all bidders have responded. Bidders that consistently time out are costing you revenue (their bids never compete) and slowing down your page (the auction waits for the full timeout before proceeding).
Tracking timeout rate per bidder is critical. If a bidder times out on more than 5-10% of auctions, you have three options: increase your global timeout (which slows the page for everyone), remove the bidder (which reduces competition), or work with the bidder to improve their response time. Real-time latency data helps you make this decision based on evidence rather than guesswork.
Not all impressions are equal. Revenue varies dramatically by geography (US/UK traffic is worth 3-5x more than Southeast Asian traffic), device type (desktop typically outperforms mobile), and ad size (300x250 and 728x90 command higher eCPMs than less standard sizes).
Dimensional analysis helps you identify where revenue is growing or declining. A revenue drop might be caused not by a technical issue, but by a shift in your traffic mix — more mobile traffic from a viral social post, for example, can lower your blended eCPM even while everything is working correctly.
Errors in the header bidding stack are more common than most publishers realize. GDPR consent signals not reaching bidders, malformed bid requests, adapter initialization failures, and network timeouts all reduce revenue silently. Tracking error rates per bidder helps you catch these issues before they compound.
There are fundamentally four approaches publishers use today to track header bidding performance. Each has distinct strengths and limitations.
Pubperf is a dedicated analytics platform built specifically for publishers running header bidding. It provides real-time visibility into every aspect of the prebid auction lifecycle with 10-minute granularity.
What sets Pubperf apart:
The integration between header bidding analytics and site performance data is particularly valuable. When you adjust your prebid timeout from 2,000ms to 1,500ms, Pubperf shows you both the revenue impact (fewer bids captured) and the performance impact (faster page loads) — letting you find the optimal balance.
Prebid.org documents over 50 analytics adapters that plug directly into the Prebid.js framework. These include adapters for Google Analytics, various ad server platforms, and specialized analytics providers. The official Prebid.js analytics module fires events for auction init, bid requested, bid response, bid won, and other lifecycle stages.
Strengths:
Limitations:
Many publishers rely on their ad server (typically Google Ad Manager) for revenue reporting. GAM provides aggregate revenue data by ad unit, advertiser, geography, and other dimensions.
Strengths:
Limitations:
Larger publishers sometimes build custom analytics pipelines using Prebid.js event handlers, server-side data collection, and visualization tools like Grafana or Looker.
Strengths:
Limitations:
When evaluating prebid analytics tools, use this checklist:
Data quality and coverage:
Real-time capability:
Integration depth:
Actionability:
Operational:
If you are running header bidding without analytics — or relying solely on ad server reports — you are almost certainly leaving revenue on the table. Here is how to get started:
Week 1: Instrument and collect baseline data. Set up your analytics tool and let it collect data for at least one full week. Resist the urge to make changes until you have a baseline.
Week 2: Identify your top issues. Look for bidders with high timeout rates, unexplained bid rate drops, or latency that consistently approaches your timeout threshold. These are your quick wins.
Week 3: Optimize and measure. Make one change at a time — adjust a timeout, remove an underperforming bidder, update floor prices — and measure the impact. The key is controlled changes with measured outcomes.
Ongoing: Monitor and alert. Set up alerts for revenue drops, timeout spikes, and error rate increases. The goal is to catch problems in minutes, not days. Review bidder performance weekly and make data-driven optimization decisions.
The publishers who treat header bidding as an active, data-driven practice consistently outperform those who set it up and forget it. Analytics is the difference between the two approaches.
Stop guessing about your header bidding performance. Pubperf gives you real-time visibility into every bidder, every auction, and every dollar — so you can optimize with confidence.